Overview: I would like you to apply the concept of Existentialism to the following short story by Franz Kafka, "The Hunger Artist." The piece utilizes the stages of Existentialism to show what it takes to be a true artist. I would like you to read the text with that critical lens in mind.
Directions: Please read "A Hunger Artist" by Franz Kafka. Again, apply the three stages of existentialism to the text. Comment in this blog space using direct evidence from The Hunger Artist AND Jean-Paul Sartre's piece on Existentialism.
"A Hunger Artist" by Franz Kafka
In the last decades interest in hunger artists has declined considerably. Whereas in earlier days there was good money to be earned putting on major productions of this sort under one’s own management, nowadays that is totally impossible. Those were different times. Back then the hunger artist captured the attention of the entire city. From day to day while the fasting lasted, participation increased. Everyone wanted to see the hunger artist at least once a day. During the later days there were people with subscription tickets who sat all day in front of the small barred cage. And there were even viewing hours at night, their impact heightened by torchlight. On fine days the cage was dragged out into the open air, and then the hunger artist was put on display particularly for the children. While for grown-ups the hunger artist was often merely a joke, something they participated in because it was fashionable, the children looked on amazed, their mouths open, holding each other’s hands for safety, as he sat there on scattered straw—spurning a chair—in black tights, looking pale, with his ribs sticking out prominently, sometimes nodding politely, answering questions with a forced smile, even sticking his arm out through the bars to let people feel how emaciated he was, but then completely sinking back into himself, so that he paid no attention to anything, not even to what was so important to him, the striking of the clock, which was the single furnishing in the cage, but merely looking out in front of him with his eyes almost shut and now and then sipping from a tiny glass of water to moisten his lips.
Apart from the changing groups of spectators there were also constant observers chosen by the public—strangely enough they were usually butchers—who, always three at a time, were given the task of observing the hunger artist day and night, so that he didn’t get anything to eat in some secret manner. It was, however, merely a formality, introduced to reassure the masses, for those who understood knew well enough that during the period of fasting the hunger artist would never, under any circumstances, have eaten the slightest thing, not even if compelled by force. The honor of his art forbade it. Naturally, none of the watchers understood that. Sometimes there were nightly groups of watchers who carried out their vigil very laxly, deliberately sitting together in a distant corner and putting all their attention into playing cards there, clearly intending to allow the hunger artist a small refreshment, which, according to their way of thinking, he could get from some secret supplies. Nothing was more excruciating to the hunger artist than such watchers. They depressed him. They made his fasting terribly difficult. Sometimes he overcame his weakness and sang during the time they were observing, for as long as he could keep it up, to show people how unjust their suspicions about him were. But that was little help. For then they just wondered among themselves about his skill at being able to eat even while singing. He much preferred the observers who sat down right against the bars and, not satisfied with the dim backlighting of the room, illuminated him with electric flashlights, which the impresario made available to them. The glaring light didn’t bother him in the slightest. Generally he couldn’t sleep at all, and he could always doze off a little under any lighting and at any hour, even in an overcrowded, noisy auditorium. With such observers, he was very happily prepared to spend the entire night without sleeping. He was ready to joke with them, to recount stories from his nomadic life and then, in turn, to listen to their stories—doing everything just to keep them awake, so that he could keep showing them once again that he had nothing to eat in his cage and that he was fasting as none of them could. He was happiest, however, when morning came and a lavish breakfast was brought for them at his own expense, on which they hurled themselves with the appetite of healthy men after a hard night’s work without sleep. True, there were still people who wanted to see in this breakfast an unfair means of influencing the observers, but that was going too far, and if they were asked whether they wanted to undertake the observers’ night shift for its own sake, without the breakfast, they excused themselves. But nonetheless they stood by their suspicions.
However, it was, in general, part of fasting that these doubts were inextricably associated with it. For, in fact, no one was in a position to spend time watching the hunger artist every day and night without interruption, so no one could know, on the basis of his own observation, whether this was a case of truly continuous, flawless fasting. The hunger artist himself was the only one who could know that and, at the same time, the only spectator capable of being completely satisfied with his own fasting. But the reason he was never satisfied was something different. Perhaps it was not fasting at all which made him so very emaciated that many people, to their own regret, had to stay away from his performance, because they couldn’t bear to look at him. For he was also so skeletal out of dissatisfaction with himself, because he alone knew something that even initiates didn’t know—how easy it was to fast. It was the easiest thing in the world. About this he did not remain silent, but people did not believe him. At best they thought he was being modest. Most of them, however, believed he was a publicity seeker or a total swindler, for whom, at all events, fasting was easy, because he understood how to make it easy, and then still had the nerve to half admit it. He had to accept all that. Over the years he had become accustomed to it. But this dissatisfaction kept gnawing at his insides all the time and never yet—and this one had to say to his credit—had he left the cage of his own free will after any period of fasting. The impresario had set the maximum length of time for the fast at forty days—he would never allow the fasting go on beyond that point, not even in the cosmopolitan cities. And, in fact, he had a good reason. Experience had shown that for about forty days one could increasingly whip up a city’s interest by gradually increasing advertising, but that then the public turned away—one could demonstrate a significant decline in popularity. In this respect, there were, of course, small differences among different towns and among different countries, but as a rule it was true that forty days was the maximum length of time. So then on the fortieth day the door of the cage—which was covered with flowers—was opened, an enthusiastic audience filled the amphitheater, a military band played, two doctors entered the cage in order to take the necessary measurements of the hunger artist, the results were announced to the auditorium through a megaphone, and finally two young ladies arrived, happy to have just been selected by lot, and sought to lead the hunger artist down a couple of steps out of the cage, where on a small table a carefully chosen hospital meal was laid out. And at this moment the hunger artist always fought back. Of course, he still freely laid his bony arms in the helpful outstretched hands of the ladies bending over him, but he did not want to stand up. Why stop right now after forty days? He could have kept going for even longer, for an unlimited length of time. Why stop right now, when he was in his best form, indeed, not yet even in his best fasting form? Why did people want to rob him of the fame of fasting longer, not just so that he could become the greatest hunger artist of all time, which, in fact, he probably was already, but also so that he could surpass himself in some unimaginable way, for he felt there were no limits to his capacity for fasting. Why did this crowd, which pretended to admire him so much, have so little patience with him? If he kept going and kept fasting even longer, why would they not tolerate it? Then, too, he was tired and felt good sitting in the straw. Now he was supposed to stand up straight and tall and go to eat, something which, when he merely imagined it, made him feel nauseous right away. With great difficulty he repressed mentioning this only out of consideration for the women. And he looked up into the eyes of these women, apparently so friendly but in reality so cruel, and shook his excessively heavy head on his feeble neck. But then happened what always happened. The impresario came forward without a word—the music made talking impossible—raised his arms over the hunger artist, as if inviting heaven to look upon its work here on the straw, this unfortunate martyr (something the hunger artist certainly was, only in a completely different sense), grabbed the hunger artist around his thin waist, in the process wanting with his exaggerated caution to make people believe that here he had to deal with something fragile, and handed him over—not without secretly shaking him a little, so that the hunger artist’s legs and upper body swung back and forth uncontrollably—to the women, who had in the meantime turned as pale as death. At this point, the hunger artist endured everything. His head lay on his chest—it was as if it had inexplicably rolled around and just stopped there—his body was arched back, his legs, in an impulse of self-preservation, pressed themselves together at the knees, but scraped the ground, as if they were not really on the floor but were looking for the real ground, and the entire weight of his body, admittedly very small, lay against one of the women, who appealed for help with flustered breath, for she had not imagined her post of honor would be like this, and then stretched her neck as far as possible, to keep her face from the least contact with the hunger artist, but then, when she couldn’t manage this and her more fortunate companion didn’t come to her assistance but trembled and remained content to hold in front of her the hunger artist’s hand, that small bundle of knuckles, she broke into tears, to the delighted laughter of the auditorium, and had to be relieved by an attendant who had been standing ready for some time. Then came the meal. The impresario put a little food into the mouth of the hunger artist, now dozing as if he were fainting, and kept up a cheerful patter designed to divert attention away from the hunger artist’s condition. Then a toast was proposed to the public, which was supposedly whispered to the impresario by the hunger artist, the orchestra confirmed everything with a great fanfare, people dispersed, and no one had the right to be dissatisfied with the event, no one except the hunger artist—he was always the only one.
He lived this way, taking small regular breaks, for many years, apparently in the spotlight, honored by the world, but for all that, his mood was usually gloomy, and it kept growing gloomier all the time, because no one understood how to take it seriously. But how was he to find consolation? What was there left for him to wish for? And if a good-natured man who felt sorry for him ever wanted to explain to him that his sadness probably came from his fasting, then it could happen, especially at an advanced stage of the fasting, that the hunger artist responded with an outburst of rage and began to shake the cage like an animal, frightening everyone. But the impresario had a way of punishing moments like this, something he was happy to use. He would make an apology for the hunger artist to the assembled public, conceding that the irritability had been provoked only by his fasting, which well-fed people did not readily understand and which was capable of excusing the behavior of the hunger artist. From there he would move on to speak about the equally hard-to-understand claim of the hunger artist that he could go on fasting for much longer than he was doing. He would praise the lofty striving, the good will, and the great self-denial no doubt contained in this claim, but then would try to contradict it simply by producing photographs, which were also on sale, for in the pictures one could see the hunger artist on the fortieth day of his fast, in bed, almost dead from exhaustion. Although the hunger artist was very familiar with this perversion of the truth, it strained his nerves every time and was too much for him. What was a result of the premature ending of the fast people were now proposing as its cause! It was impossible to fight against this lack of understanding, against this world of misunderstanding. In good faith he still always listened eagerly to the impresario at the bars of his cage, but each time, once the photographs came out, he would let go of the bars and, with a sigh, sink back into the straw, and a reassured public could come up again and view him.
When those who had witnessed such scenes thought back on them a few years later, often they were unable to understand themselves. For in the meantime that change mentioned above had set in. It happened almost immediately. There may have been more profound reasons for it, but who bothered to discover what they were? At any rate, one day the pampered hunger artist saw himself abandoned by the crowd of pleasure seekers, who preferred to stream to other attractions. The impresario chased around half of Europe one more time with him, to see whether he could rediscover the old interest here and there. It was all futile. It was as if a secret agreement against the fasting performances had really developed everywhere. Naturally, the truth is that it could not have happened so quickly, and people later remembered some things which in the days of intoxicating success they had not paid sufficient attention to, some inadequately suppressed indications, but now it was too late to do anything to counter them. Of course, it was certain that the popularity of fasting would return once more someday, but for those now alive that was no consolation. What was the hunger artist to do now? The man whom thousands of people had cheered on could not display himself in show booths at small fun fairs, and the hunger artist was not only too old to take up a different profession, but was fanatically devoted to fasting more than anything else. So he said farewell to the impresario, an incomparable companion on his life’s road, and let himself be hired by a large circus. In order to spare his own sensitive feelings, he didn’t even look at the terms of his contract.
A large circus with its huge number of men, animals, and gimmicks, which are constantly being let go and replenished, can use anyone at any time, even a hunger artist, provided, of course, his demands are modest. Moreover, in this particular case it was not only the hunger artist himself who was engaged, but also his old and famous name. In fact, given the characteristic nature of his art, which was not diminished by his advancing age, one could never claim that a worn-out artist, who no longer stood at the pinnacle of his ability, wanted to escape to a quiet position in the circus. On the contrary, the hunger artist declared that he could fast just as well as in earlier times—a claim that was entirely credible. Indeed, he even affirmed that if people would let him do what he wanted—and he was promised this without further ado—he would really now legitimately amaze the world for the first time, an assertion which, however, given the mood of the time, something the hunger artist in his enthusiasm easily overlooked, only brought smiles from the experts.
In essence, however, the hunger artist had also not forgotten his sense of the way things really were, and he took it as self-evident that people would not set him and his cage up as some star attraction in the middle of the arena, but would move him outside in some other readily accessible spot near the animal stalls. Huge brightly painted signs surrounded the cage and announced what there was to look at there. During the intervals in the main performance, when the general public pushed out towards the menagerie in order to see the animals, they could hardly avoid moving past the hunger artist and stopping there a moment. They would perhaps have remained with him longer, if those pushing up behind them in the narrow passageway, who did not understand this pause on the way to the animal stalls they wanted to see, had not made a longer peaceful observation impossible. This was also the reason why the hunger artist began to tremble before these visiting hours, which he naturally used to long for as the main purpose of his life. In the early days he could hardly wait for the pauses in the performances. He had looked forward with delight to the crowd pouring around him, until he became convinced only too quickly—and even the most stubborn, almost deliberate self-deception could not hold out against the experience—that, judging by their intentions, most of these people were, time and again without exception, only visiting the menagerie. And this view from a distance still remained his most beautiful moment. For when they had come right up to him, he immediately got an earful from the shouting and cursing of the two steadily increasing groups, the ones who wanted to take their time looking at the hunger artist, not with any understanding but on a whim or from mere defiance—for him these ones were soon the more painful—and a second group of people whose only demand was to go straight to the animal stalls. Once the large crowds had passed, the late-comers would arrive, and although there was no longer anything preventing these people from sticking around for as long as they wanted, they rushed past with long strides, almost without a sideways glance, to get to the animals in time. And it was an all-too-rare stroke of luck when the father of a family came by with his children, pointed his finger at the hunger artist, gave a detailed explanation about what was going on here, and talked of earlier years, when he had been present at similar but incomparably more magnificent performances, and then the children, because they had been inadequately prepared at school and in life, always stood around still uncomprehendingly. What was fasting to them? But nonetheless the brightness of the look in their searching eyes revealed something of new and more gracious times coming. Perhaps, the hunger artist said to himself sometimes, everything would be a little better if his location were not quite so near the animal stalls. That way it would be easy for people to make their choice, to say nothing of the fact that he was very upset and constantly depressed by the stink from the stalls, the animals’ commotion at night, the pieces of raw meat dragged past him for the carnivorous beasts, and the roars at feeding time. But he did not dare to approach the administration about it. In any case, he had the animals to thank for the crowds of visitors among whom, now and then, there could also be one destined for him. And who knew where they would hide him if he wished to remind them of his existence and, along with that, of the fact that, strictly speaking, he was only an obstacle on the way to the menagerie.
A small obstacle, at any rate, a constantly diminishing obstacle. People became accustomed to thinking it strange that in these times they would want to pay attention to a hunger artist, and with this habitual awareness the judgment on him was pronounced. He might fast as well as he could—and he did—but nothing could save him anymore. People went straight past him. Try to explain the art of fasting to anyone! If someone doesn’t feel it, then he cannot be made to understand it. The beautiful signs became dirty and illegible. People tore them down, and no one thought of replacing them. The small table with the number of days the fasting had lasted, which early on had been carefully renewed every day, remained unchanged for a long time, for after the first weeks the staff grew tired of even this small task. And so the hunger artist kept fasting on and on, as he once had dreamed about in earlier times, and he had no difficulty at all managing to achieve what he had predicted back then, but no one was counting the days—no one, not even the hunger artist himself, knew how great his achievement was by this point, and his heart grew heavy. And when once in a while a person strolling past stood there making fun of the old number and talking of a swindle, that was in a sense the stupidest lie which indifference and innate maliciousness could invent, for the hunger artist was not being deceptive—he was working honestly—but the world was cheating him of his reward.
Many days went by once more, and this, too, came to an end. Finally the cage caught the attention of a supervisor, and he asked the attendant why they had left this perfectly useful cage standing here unused with rotting straw inside. Nobody knew, until one man, with the help of the table with the number on it, remembered the hunger artist. They pushed the straw around with poles and found the hunger artist in there. “Are you still fasting?” the supervisor asked. “When are you finally going to stop?” “Forgive me everything,” whispered the hunger artist. Only the supervisor, who was pressing his ear up against the cage, understood him. “Certainly,” said the supervisor, tapping his forehead with his finger in order to indicate to the staff the state the hunger artist was in, “we forgive you.” “I always wanted you to admire my fasting,” said the hunger artist. “But we do admire it,” said the supervisor obligingly. “But you shouldn’t admire it,” said the hunger artist. “Well then, we don’t admire it,” said the supervisor, “but why shouldn’t we admire it?” “Because I have to fast. I can’t do anything else,” said the hunger artist. “Just look at you,” said the supervisor, “why can’t you do anything else?” “Because,” said the hunger artist, lifting his head a little and, with his lips pursed as if for a kiss, speaking right into the supervisor’s ear so that he wouldn’t miss anything, “because I couldn’t find a food that tasted good to me. If had found that, believe me, I would not have made a spectacle of myself and would have eaten to my heart’s content, like you and everyone else.” Those were his last words, but in his failing eyes there was still the firm, if no longer proud, conviction that he was continuing to fast.
“All right, tidy this up now,” said the supervisor. And they buried the hunger artist along with the straw. But in his cage they put a young panther. Even for a person with the dullest mind it was clearly refreshing to see this wild animal prowling around in this cage, which had been dreary for such a long time. It lacked nothing. Without having to think much about it, the guards brought the animal food whose taste it enjoyed. It never seemed once to miss its freedom. This noble body, equipped with everything necessary, almost to the point of bursting, even appeared to carry freedom around with it. That seemed to be located somewhere or other in its teeth, and its joy in living came with such strong passion from its throat that it was not easy for spectators to keep watching. But they controlled themselves, kept pressing around the cage, and had no desire at all to move on.
The starvation artist exhibits the existential trait of believing that your actions are the best show of your character and that those actions are internalized by the rest of the population. The artist refuses to break his fast, even in moderation in secret solely because “the honor of his art forbade it.” In this he is a spokesperson for the first belief of existentialism: "The man who involves himself and who realizes that he is not only the person he chooses to be, but also a law-maker who is, at the same time, choosing all mankind as well as himself, cannot help escape the feeling of his total and deep responsibility.” Because he wants art to be true and authentic, his art must be this. The problem with this only arises from the apathy of his audience. It is one thing to be honest and hoping that the world will follow in your lead, it's another when in reality this doesn't happen: “It was impossible to fight against this lack of understanding, against this world of misunderstanding.” This signals another pillar of existentialism: despair. When one believes in something that they know to be true so fully, yet so painfully because they stand alone in that belief, that is a recipe for the loss of hope. One of the notions of Sartre’s existentialism is a result of the absence of the belief in god. When there is no religion, there is no written moral code, to evidence for the beliefs humans hold dear, the spirit of humanity is reduced to the actions of the people. When the starvation artist is ignored thinks, “for the hunger artist was not being deceptive—he was working honestly—but the world was cheating him of his reward.” The spectators opinion of him, of which there is very little, become the final word on the matter. Without a higher power seeing his efforts, and his efforts being ignored by the population, the judges of society, that leaves him with no recognition, hopeless and forlorn.” I wish I understood more about the artist’s last words and the panther’s presence in the cage. I don't really believe him when he says “because I couldn’t find a food that tasted good to me. If had found that, believe me, I would not have made a spectacle of myself and would have eaten to my heart’s content, like you and everyone else.” I don't think he was ever meant to be just like everyone else; I think he initially did this for the art’s sake, just look at his dedication to the honestly of the art form. I think he kept doing it out of habit and fear: even the greatest artists are subject to human’s dislike for change. I want the classes insights on the panther, I think that I’m missing something. See y’all tomorrow!
ReplyDeleteThis short story really covered a wide range of topics and held me towards the very end. The first thing I noticed was the bit of irony in the story, the concept of a hunger artist which is this big spectacle and gathers many spectators just to watch someone starve themselves. While in comparison what is a somewhat popular event to watch now is food eating competitions. As humans, in general, we enjoy viewing extremes, the intensity of these end of the spectrum is what attracts ‘normal’ people. I also noticed a tone where eating disorders and starvation could be viewed as art and sort of justify it, but at the same time the artist is becoming this weak and thin creature becoming less human as the weight is a loss, then the attraction becomes like a car accident, too ugly to look away. I also found it interesting how the story takes on the perspective of the artist and how they felt that their actions were in fact art. The artist’s dedication to it was a bit too surreal “the honor of his art forbade it”. As well as how they became frustrated with the audience for not completely being enamored by them, “because no one understood how to take it seriously”. But isn’t essentially what the artist is doing is starvation which a slow death? And could life not be considered a slow death because eventually, we die? In the end, I felt that it was very anti-climatic, in the end, no one was really appreciating nor agreeing with him that what he was doing was art ( and I don’t either) but I do admire his passion for continuing to starve and believe in his work. But his last words kind of ruined it for me, “is lips pursed as if for a kiss, speaking right into the supervisor’s ear so that he wouldn’t miss anything, “because I couldn’t find a food that tasted good to me. If had found that, believe me, I would not have made a spectacle of myself and would have eaten to my heart’s content, like you and everyone else.” I think its just stupid and the author tried to add a bit of humor and change this story into a comedy which it is clearly not. I think it weakens the depth of what the message of piece is about.
ReplyDeleteWith a focus on Existentialism, the way the artist holds his passion for his art can almost align with the idea of character, and of speaking relatively about existentialism, if his art represented his character, well eventually his character became unenjoyable and people moved on with their lives. With the small interaction with the supervisor, it is only then that the artist feels regret for pushing his art on everyone and not accepting other people’s thoughts or opinions. At this point, I am reminded of our discussion in class and how we must acknowledge how our actions affect others. So the artist must acknowledge the audience’s thoughts on his art.
With a focus on Existentialism, the way the artist holds his passion for his art can almost align with the idea of character, and of speaking relatively about existentialism, if his art represented his character, well eventually his character became unenjoyable and people moved on with their lives. With the small interaction with the supervisor, it is only then that the artist feels regret for pushing his art on everyone and not accepting other people’s thoughts or opinions. At this point, I am reminded of our discussion in class and how we must acknowledge how our actions affect others. So the artist must acknowledge the audience’s thoughts on his art.
I accidentally copied the last paragraph twice so just ignore it starts with " With a focus " and ends with "thoughts on his art"
DeleteBetween reading this essay and the Existentialism blog below, I have finally come to an understanding about not only the connection between these two readings, but an understanding of what existentialism truly means. Existing and being in the real world is one thing, but your meaning in it is what truly allows one to exist. Although confusing, it took reading “The Hungry Artist” for me to understand further as to what existentialism meant in one’s life. For the hungry artist, he existed but it was only when he was fasting and starving himself, that his popularity grew. He was always under someone’s watch and that was his “essence” in a way, the idea that he was getting attention just from fasting - another part of it. But, without the essence he wasn’t existing - as shown from when he went on into the circus and people were paying more attention to the animals rather than to him. Another part of this existentialism was the “spiritual toughness” aspect. His mind played a large role in his ability to fast as well as how he stayed so strong while people consistently watched him in the cage. Without this ability to stay strong while others tempted him or confused him, his spiritual toughness would’ve lacked what it really did and this symbolized his version of existentialism to the reader. In “Existentialism is Humanism” by Satre, there was one quote which applies to this “Hungry Artist” which i went back to find, “it puts every man in possession of himself as he is, and places the entire responsibility for his existence squarely upon his own shoulders.” This quote represents yet another factor of existentialism, being responsibility. A part of existentialism is being responsible for what you choose and that you are in charge of your own actions and the way it affects/possesses you. This quote struck me especially while reading this essay because the man was not necessarily forced to fast, but he felt he needed to. I’m not sure if this was because of his “spiritual toughness”, or his past, or just from the feel of the attention he receives from his audience, but the responsibility of his existence is strictly upon himself. Towards the end, in fact, as he is close to dying, he speaks to one of the staff from the circus, and tells him, “I always wanted you to admire my fasting,” said the hunger artist. “But we do admire it,” said the supervisor obligingly. “But you shouldn’t admire it,” said the hunger artist. “Well then, we don’t admire it,” said the supervisor, “but why shouldn’t we admire it?” “Because I have to fast. I can’t do anything else,” said the hunger artist.” This entire quote truly shows his “essence” of existence because he wants other people to admire this essence, however the responsibility of it is on himself because he is choosing how he lives as well as is choosing ‘humanity’ because he believes he is doing what people want - but he isn’t. It was tough to read this because I couldn’t stop imagining the pain he went through throughout his life, but it was really interesting to be able to connect the idea of existentialism with this essay!
ReplyDeleteThe description of the life of a hunger artist depicted by Franz Kafka conveys the crude reality of those who commit so passionately to their art, that they become an exhibit themselves. The three pillars of existentialism can be applied to the short story by the means of further understanding not only the gaunt man’s motives, but also his impact.
ReplyDeletehumans in forlornness: God does not exist and thus there is no superior force dictating one’s morality. Since there is no God, there is no optimal being predetermining one’s ‘essence’, and thus humans become a series of ‘undertakings’ that they alone are responsible for. The hunger artist, therefore, is the creator and manufacturer of his own behavior; and there you have freedom of choice, and it’s crushing reality that when left alone to make our own decisions, we often choose those that hurt us the most.
“The hunger artist himself was the only one who could know that and, at the same time, the only spectator capable of being completely satisfied with his own fasting,” thus, his longing for fasting is but a response to his need to deeper meaning, understanding. However, it appears that this journeys was not successful, “he was always the only one” who did not seem to be satisfied with his own performance, always craving for more. The artist was not a “publicity seeker or a total swindler,” but rather someone deeply committed to their craft, someone who was so painfully aware of his own needs, that he was the sole creator of his own essence, and even if he may have attempted to hide it, “Anguish is evident, even when it conceals itself."
As for humans in despair, it was clear to the artist that his art was misunderstood, for he was seen as a puppet, removed from society. “Try to explain the art of fasting to anyone! If someone doesn’t feel it, then he cannot be made to understand it.” No matter for hard the artist tried to convey his motive, “ It was impossible to fight against this lack of understanding, against this world of misunderstanding.” His fight thus was meaningless, for although he was capable to attract the masses, he was unable to persuade them into his point of view. And thus the hunger artist died, alone, and misunderstood, for “No God, no scheme,” could “adapt the world and its possibilities” to his will.
“A Hunger Artist” tells an unusual story about a man who starves himself for his art. By doing so he is the work of art itself. The hunger artist claims to be doing so this because he is devoted to his artform. He believes that he is misunderstood by the world, but yet still relies on the world for validation. He spends the majority of his life being watched by people, looking forward to being stared at by large crowds. However, the hunger artist is living a paradoxical life, claiming to be a misunderstood artist while relying on the validation of those that watch him. It is because of this that the hunger artist is facing an existential crisis. Many people claim to be existentialists when they want “to join in the latest scandal”. This is essentially what the hunger artist is doing. He is rebelling against society’s norms, claiming that it is for his art. When his art form becomes less popular, however, the hunger artist feels despair. He continues to fast, to the point where “not even the hunger artist himself, knew how great his achievement was by this point, and his heart grew heavy.” The hunger artist at this point is truly living for his art. There is no one to admire his work or his suffering. There is nothing else for him to do. This is the essence of existentialism. The hunger artist is now “working honestly” and only for himself, choosing to do what he does not simply because others will watch. Existentialism is the philosophy that man “is what he wills” and it is not until the end of the story, when no one is watching him, that the hunger artist truly becomes what he wills.
ReplyDeleteIn “A Hunger Artist” by Franz Kafka, it tells a story of a hunger artist traveling throughout Europe as an entertainment piece. However, the interest in watching hunger artists came mostly from children who were shocked at the sight and adults, usually butchers who watch with suspicion. Also, after 40 days of fasting, much of the interest diminishes forcing the hunger artist to break his fast against his will. In the first stage of existentialism for Humans in anguish, it says “The man who involves himself and who realizes that he is not only the person he chooses to be, but also a law-maker who is, at the same time, choosing all mankind as well as himself, cannot help escape the feeling of his total and deep responsibility.” The hunger artist suffers at the hands of the audience’s expectations and therefore is responsible for being their entertainment. With humans in forlornness, “Neither within him or without does man find anything to cling to.” In this story the hunger artist tries to cling onto fasting. In humans in despair, “It means that we shall confine ourselves to reckoning only with what depends upon our will, or on the ensemble of probabilities which make our action possible”. This applies to the hunger artist because he chose to fast even though it led to his demise in the end.
ReplyDeleteThe Hunger Artist deals with the concept of finding purpose and acceptance in a society that, more often than not, feels no compassion for anyone but itself. To make a career, to emphasize his existence, the hunger artist displays his ability to fast to a crowd of onlookers who can neither understand nor sympathize with his cause. Only as his popularity declines and he is overlooked in favor of the animals he comes to share his space with- does the hunger artist realize his unhappiness is not as a result of not being able to starve himself for longer periods of time, but because of the lack of purpose he has created for his life.
ReplyDeleteThis concept, the concept that the life the hunger artist reaped was only sowed by his own hand and by no one else, sources from existentialists who believe “man is nothing else but what he purposes, he exists only in so far as he realises himself, he is therefore nothing else but the sum of his actions, nothing else but what his life is.” The hunger artist “might fast as well as he could,” but ultimately it wasn’t the joy of fasting for as long as he possibly could that would give him happiness- “nothing could save him anymore” as he realized that what gave him happiness was the admiration of others that made him feel as though he had a purpose in life and a place in the world of importance and significance.
But that was a lie as well. Him fasting didn’t give him any significance in life, but merely made him a spectacle to be watched and laughed at. He failed to realize what existentialist would call humans in anguish, where he could have looked past himself and seen “he is not only the person he chooses to be, but also a law-maker who is, at the same time, choosing all mankind as well as himself.” He chose to starve himself for his own self-satisfaction, and although gave others some entertainment to look at, gave no impact on the world as to the great achievements he accomplished. Their entertainment could never fulfill his expectation for the recognition and respect he truly desired. His hope for some greater force to strike down on someone so that they may see his accomplishments would never come, because there is no greater force, according to existentialist, that will carve out his life for him. He is a human in despair as he realizes that “no God, no scheme, can adapt the world and its possibilities to [his] will.”
In the story "A Hunger Artist" by Franz Kafka, there is a man who is truly devout to the art of starving himself. To me, the story was very strange, but towards the middle and end I was able to grab some more meaning from it. This blog post is aptly named An artist in existential crisis, because that's truly what this is. This artist has dedicated so much to the art of fasting, but his prime has passed and he no longer has the viewers and audience he desires. However, even back when he had an audience, he suffered with this existential crisis. He was not able to prove to everyone that he truly did not eat, and as a result, his art was less impactful. This would understandably bother someone. Especially when putting literally everything into the performance only to have it questioned. After people have lost interest in the artist, he still continues to perform because it is the only thing he knows. And as the time is not recorded, what would be his best performance is completely ignored. The story is sad, because this is the epitome of someone who is struggling with an existential crisis and is provided no aid.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed how Franz Kafka setup this short story. One thing that I noticed from the beginning was the point of view of the piece. It was from the perspective of an omniscient narrator. In the short story, having such a narrator did two things. First, it allowed the reader to understand what those around the hunger-artist was feeling. But more importantly, the reader was able to know what was going through the mind of the hunger-artist. I believe that Kafka decided to use an omniscient narrator because he saw that people had misconceptions about existentialism. By introducing the topic through a medium that people are familiar with, a hunger-artist, his hope was to clear up those misconceptions and show others what existentialism entails.
ReplyDeleteNow connecting back to the piece, I was often struck by the reasoning of the hunger artist. For example, in the beginning of the text, I thought that the hunger-artist would have been thrilled to eat after the event was over, but, instead, the thought going through his mind is “Why stop right now after forty days?” and “Why did people want to rob him of the fame” (“A Hunger Artist” Kafka). I would have never considered this viewpoint, but once in the “mind” of the hunger-artist, his reasoning starts to make sense. Why are people depriving someone of his hobby, and in return giving him something he does like(food).
This is super depressing for so many reasons. This guy is literally fasting because he isn't good at anything else, and people just watch and are entertained by it. I honestly don't know how real of a concept it is, but if this is real, it reminds me of the Colosseum. People watch suffering and are entertained by it. But the people in the Colosseum fighting were often slaves forced to do this. The fasting man is similar in that he is a slave to his art, to the eyes of all these people. He lives in anguish in not that he is responsible for people, but that he is no longer as responsible as he used to be. He does not have the effect he used to, and fasting artists are a dying breed. He knows his essence is coming to an end, and with that his existence. And it's sad because his essence turned out to be so unfortunate. He believes his essence to be fasting, simply "because I couldn’t find a food that tasted good to me. If had found that, believe me, I would not have made a spectacle of myself and would have eaten to my heart’s content, like you and everyone else." But why was that the factor in his essence? Why couldn't it be something else? I feel like he limited himself but then again I don't really know because honestly it's still a little confusing to me.
ReplyDeleteThe Hunger artist relates to existentialism in a few important ways. The first of which is that the hunger artist, in its very nature, is a man who struggles with his existence. He is in anguish, searching for spiritual sustenance. When he confesses at the end that he fasts “because I couldn’t find a food that tasted good to me. If had found that, believe me, I would not have made a spectacle of myself and would have eaten to my heart’s content, like you and everyone else”, he is not talking about physical nourishment so much as he is about food for the mind. In his fasting he attempts to find that sustenance by cutting his ties to the physical, and searching for the mental. However, the hunger artist exists in a paradox. In order to push himself beyond the limit of 40 days prescribed by the Impresario, he loses the interest of the public, but gains the ability to search further for his goals. Yet, he also deeply wishes for the admiration of onlookers, and to be recognized for his achievements. In this conundrum he finds shame. It relates to the sense of existential despair, and forlornness. He cannot escape the responsibility for his actions, and knows the truth about why he does what he does. Therefore, he feels shame for what he does due to him feeling untrue to his nature. In terms of forlornness, he feels alone in his cage, looking out at the outside world but never taking part in it. Nobody can understand his craft, and yet all he wants is to be recognized for it, but the further he goes the more repulsive he becomes to them. This is shown when on his big day exiting the cage, one of the women with the supposed “honor” of helping him begins crying because she is so repulsed. Not only this, but he is alone in the sense that he is responsible for his decision to fast, and has no one to stand beside him or to blame. It is him and him alone who decided, and thus all of the guilt he may feel is his own to feel. In the end, when the panther replaces him in the cage, it is an interesting juxtaposition. The panther is full of life and vigor, but has no freedom. The artist on the other hand, is dying and forces himself to be this way, but in his own sense he finds a sort of spiritual freedom. However, the freedom ends up with him being forgotten and alone, while the panther in it's youthful spirit is constantly surrounded with onlookers. It is an interesting take by Kafka on the necessary balance between the “pull from above” towards the spiritual world, with the “pull from below” towards the physical.
ReplyDeleteI found this reading to be very interesting. I thought it was awful that people would actually go to see this “hunger artist” because they were just watching someone suffer. If I was to see such an exhibit, I think I’d be interested at first, but find it hard to look at. It may be a similar reason to people slowing down while they drive past a car accident. People are interested in other people’s lives and want to know things that are happening. While the car accident may not affect their life at all, they want to know what happened and if the people are okay. Similarly, seeing the hunger artist would be viewing someone who is very different from themselves. In our society in America, we value food a lot. It is common for people to be overweight or obese, as the community has made it hard to eat healthy food and has made eating a pleasurable event. It would be fascinating to see someone able to go without eating anything, while many people couldn’t even think about missing a single meal or their favorite dessert. It does connect to existentialism in the sense that the hunger artist is doing what they want and are good at, as well as thinking for themselves. When this was popular, I can imagine that there were also a lot of people in opposition of it, as it is essentially self imposed torture. Off of that, I thought this was very applicable to eating disorders as they’re seen in our society today. Anyone going that long without eating surely has some form of an eating disorder, even if it is developed over time. When the hunger artist in the story was finished with his forty days, he still did not want to eat. If this way of thinking is connected to existentialism, I think that it would glamorize eating disorders to some extent. If any of this was around in today’s society, it would be very problematic, as it could pass as existentialism. It also would never be successful nowadays because most people would realize how unhealthy it is, both physically and mentally. A hunger artist today would be sent to get help, rather than watched for entertainment.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed the story due to how different and absurd it was, despite it being something that has actually happened. We think nowadays that society is so mature and ethical and nothing being done today we would think would need to be stopped. However, looking back at the story one might raise their eyebrows as to how they allowed such behavior to go on display. Despite this, the society at that time thought it was entirely normal. Which makes me question what's going on in our society currently that maybe hundred years later people might look back and be like how the hell did they let that happen. One thing that was very interesting to me was the parallel of the panther to the hunger artist. Despite the panther being “enslaved” it kinda had an easier life with more freedom. On the other hand, the hunger artist has to put himself in the cage and gives up his freedom willingly. The panther gets more attention however. I find this interesting due to how despite the hunger artist dedicating everything to his work it gets outdone by a simple animal whos just doing their thing.
ReplyDeleteThe story of the hunger artist shows existentialism because the artist makes himself relevant for as long as he can. He uses his art to be seen and to make a place for him. But when something better and more interesting comes along, he is forgotten. He is forced to end the show, and of course he is angry. The anguish is that he literally put his life on the line for his art. He has to have incredible mental and physical strength to do what he did. Also, he is surrounded by all these fake artists that aren’t as committed as he. Then, this new and exciting thing to look at comes along, and the animal doesn’t have to do anything, it simply just has to be itself. I think this story is interesting because it makes me question what type of content I consume, and makes me reconsider the work it took to put into an art form rather then how entertaining it really is.
ReplyDeleteIt may seem absurd or grotesque at first when you think about these masses of people coming to see the starving artist, but how different is it from other things humans have done in the past or are doing now? Do we not watch movies, read books, have or had other forms of entertainment that have been centered around or at least mentioned someone's demise? I feel that humans have an odd infatuation with suffering, probably because we will never be able to truly understand one another's suffering. We can get an idea of it, but we can't feel what other people are feeling. Anyways, as soon as the people got bored with the hunger artist, they left. Which is exactly how it is nowadays and really all of life. We live to be satisfied and as soon as we're bored, we walk away in search of the next thing to hold our attention. The artist has spent so much time focused on his task, on his progress, on his talent, that he has nothing left to give once everyone is gone. He doesn't want to, nor can he, learn to do something else. Whether that is because he is old or stubborn or uninterested or whatever. He sees himself as a hunger artist and nothing else. So he will be moved around, attempting to do what he does best, until he dies. And when he dies, he is replaced with something completely the opposite of him; a panther. Which kind of reminds me of different trends throughout the years. It made me think, though this might just be a stretch, of when something goes out of style, something completely different comes in style. Something to forget about the last stylish thing, something to say 'we no longer like that obviously, look what we like now'. I don't know. But it was a wonderful story, very different from anything I've ever read. It gave me a new perspective on people in general and why we do the things we do.
ReplyDeleteI was deeply disturbed by “A Hunger Artist” by Franz Kafka. The story seems to justify and support the act of self starvation, describing it as an “art.” However, if the actions of the artist are replaced by “making music” or “painting” and it is this which the crowd cannot understand, then it makes perfect sense. The hunger artist has chosen to do this, taking complete and total responsibility for his actions. This is his anguish. He is “choosing all mankind as well as himself,” and the fact that his spectators don’t understand his art deeply upsets him. It is said that “his mood was usually gloomy, and it kept growing gloomier all the time, because no one understood how to take [his art] seriously.” As he is put up on display the general public, they cannot see his art as anything more than something to stare at for a while, as entertainment. However, since the attention received by the hunger artist is dependent entirely on the interest of the public, it comes as little surprise that it could not last. As the public loses interest, the artist finds himself alone in his cage, and “no one, not even the hunger artist himself, knew how [long he had been fasting] by this point, and his heart grew heavy.” Like the hunger artist, we, as humans, also find ourselves alone- there is no God. Our achievements are our own, for no one but ourselves, and there is no one to verify that our actions are right because “nowhere is it written that the Good exists, that we must be honest, that we must not lie.” The hunger artist no longer has the crowd to support him and tell him he must continue to fast, and while he finds this distressing, he continues nonetheless- much the way humans should continue to try to improve the world for its own good without the approval of some higher being. Finally, it is worth noting that the years spent fasting wore on the hunger artist. He only continued this (dare I say unhealthy) habit “because [he] couldn’t find a food that tasted good to [him].” He became a hunger artist because it was the only way he could express himself. He took the only action that he could, much the way that as a species, humanity “shall confine ourselves to reckoning only with what depends upon our will.” We can only do so much, and while the limitations of our society may drag us down, the hunger artist shows that this can be overcome.
ReplyDeleteOkay this story is not at all what I expected. I find it strange that he puts himself on display in a public location where he fasts for a long period of time. What is kind of ironic is that this essay is called “Hunger Artist” yet he states that he is never hungry, so why does he obtain so much fame for this if he is not truly hungry. I don’t know it’s just a weird thing that I observed. The artist was very much addicted to fame, he lived for the attention he got from the audience’s fascination. His pride does in fact enable him to improve his fasting, but also ultimately stops him from reaching his goals and causes isolation with others. His fame starts to die down and people would watch him but only for a bit. Even at the peak of his popularity no one truly understood or appreciated his art. The artist then starts to feel loneliness and isolation. Franz Kafka used existentialism to portray how the artist comes to terms with being isolated from everyone. I am still lowkey shook by this short story but I also did find some parts of it interesting. I have never heard a story like this before and I look forward to this unit of AP Literature.
ReplyDeleteThe 40 day limit is important to acknowledge in the story. Whether it had been 5 or 2793 days, it still exposes a human quality that allows us to lose interest over a certain period of time. It applies to many human attractions, and it also works as a basis for marketing. From the perspective of the people, the hunger artists was probably just a really interesting attraction that you would have to go see at least once while in town. This, of course, reduces the art of the artist to that of a circus, uncoincidentally where he ended up. No one but the artists could understand the art, proving the statement true that he was “the only spectator capable of being completely satisfied with his own fasting.” This comments on an existential principle that encourages a lack of understanding. The people would never be able to understand the true meaning of the starvation, but with an existential outlook, they could be satisfied with such an inability, or even thrilled by it, allowing them to wonder what it is like to be starved. But, people gave him faith when in fact he wanted not faith but understanding. He starved himself “so that he could surpass himself in some unimaginable way,” not because others believed he could, but that he did. He wanted people to see that they could put themselves in anguish to come to terms with life, but they only saw his anguish, and left.
ReplyDeleteWhen he spoke his last words, he was very literal, but the “food” that he could find to taste good was the good feeling of life. He couldn’t come to terms with himself without feeling the pain of starvation. He displayed existentialism because he wasn’t able understand the pain until he put it upon himself. When we hear about starvation in the world, or rape or disease or injustice and discrimination, we will never be able to fully understand what it is like if we are never actually subjected to it. We view these horrible phenomenons as attractions from others and on the news. We may never understand what it truly feels like to be in anguish, but all the hunger artist wanted was for people to try. They didn’t; They just looked with their kids for a while and strolled along as if he were a dead deer. They will never truly understand how the starvation feels, but the difference is that they never tried. People sometimes don’t like art because it brings anguish upon them in trying to understand. They never truly will, but the artist will be satisfied as long as they make an effort.
The Hunger Artist is a perfect example of Sartre’s theory of existentialism: a person defines their own life with their actions. Nothing is left up to chance, the outcome of actions creates the future. The Hunger Artist refuses to give up and breaks his fast. He sets his mind to one goal and takes specific actions to achieve it. He stops at nothing for his art to maintain what he sees as its authenticity. His starvation is a unique art from what he claims he does without regard to the outside world. Yet the disregard of his actions from the audience appears to disturb him deeply. He craved the attention and approval of others in his pursuits. He wanted so badly to continue his fast with the hope to one day achieve this though he claimed he wanted to continue because he believed he could do what no one else before him could. His pain in deprivation is entertainment to the spectators as they mock his efforts. He fails to understand a concept of existentialism which says that “he exists only in so far as he realizes himself, he is therefore nothing else but the sum of his actions.” He only has control over his actions, he has no control in life over the actions of others and therefore the outcome of those actions. The result of sole focus on others rather than self-satisfaction leaves him lonely and depressed without the ability to taste the good of life.
ReplyDelete